Non-subdivisions re-included in subdivision XML

Description

It’s actually again:

See

Activity

Steven R. Loomis February 11, 2025 at 6:50 PM

OK, this should be a known issue then.

Mark Davis February 11, 2025 at 2:21 AM

Right, not for 47.

A test sounds good. I think those might only occur in en.xml, but in any event they need to be removed.

Another possible test would be to remove any with subdivision aliases where the reason is “overlong”. (There’s API on SupplementalDataInfo to get those.)

I just did a quick regex check for

and the only ones were in ccp.xml. A unit test would be nice to prevent future ones.

Steven R. Loomis February 10, 2025 at 5:39 PM

Should I add this to the subdivision test code? Otherwise I’m assuming this is not for 47 since it’s still NEW

Details

Priority

Assignee

Reporter

Components

Created January 13, 2025 at 10:49 PM
Updated February 11, 2025 at 6:50 PM